Skip to main content

tv   CNN Newsroom With Fredricka Whitfield  CNN  July 14, 2018 9:00am-10:00am PDT

9:00 am
hug. "i think arden is a hero," he says. "he helped get everyone out of that cave." the extraordinary international effort to rescue the boys brought together military specialists and dive experts from across the world. and putting their prejudices aside, helped unify a country. david mckenzie, cnn, northern thailand. >> well, one more hero in that cave. we have more just ahead in "newsroom" and it all starts right now. hello, it is 12:00 here on the east coast. i'm jim sciutto in new york in today for fredricka whitfield. thanks so much for joining me. the trump/putin summit set for monday still on. this, despite new charges in mueller's russia probe against 12 russian intelligence officers, as well as growing calls from lawmakers to cancel the sit-down between the two leaders entirely. the white house is confirming, though, the summit is still on.
9:01 am
the two leaders will, after their sit-down, speak to the press in a joint press conference. all of this as president trump weighs in on the latest indictments by blaming his predecessor instead of condemning russia or mentioning russia at all. cnn's white house correspondent abby phillips, she's been traveling with the president. she's in glass go, scotland. has the president said this is a bad thing, we want to stop? >> reporter: hi, jim. of all the things being said, both by the white house and by the president, that is the one thing that seems to be very much absent from these statements. the president, in this tweet this morning, talking about the indictments that were handed down yesterday by the mueller investigation, and he said this, the stories you heard about the 12 russians yesterday took place during the obama administration, not the trump administration. why didn't they do something about it, especially when it was
9:02 am
reported that president obama was informed by the fbi in september before the election? once again here, the president blaming his predecessor for this problem and not at all mentioning vladimir putin, mentioning the fact that these individuals were high level officials in the russian intelligence operation, and were named with a lot of evidence that they were involved in this hacking. it kind of mirrors the statement we got from the white house yesterday, that seemed to vindicate president trump, emphasizing the fact that no americans were named, but not at all condemning the underlining actions here. president trump is here in scotland preparing for this trip to helsinki where he will meet with president putin. he said he will bring up election meddling, but there's a lot of reason to expect here that the president is not exactly going to confront putin about it. whenever he's asked about this, he's saying, i'll bring it up, but putin keeps denying that he did it. at one point in the last year,
9:03 am
he's told reporters that he believes putin, that putin -- that putin believes that he's telling the truth when he says that he didn't do it. of course, no one in the united states and in the intelligence community and even among republicans in congress believes that to be true except perhaps for the president. meanwhile, to his earlier point about whether president obama did, in fact, do something about it, there is actually a lot of evidence that the obama administration tried to in the months leading up to the election. confronting putin, obama confronted putin in a meeting, face-to-face. their counterparts spoke about this. and obama administration officials warned state-level election officials to beonthe lookout for possible intrusions into their election system. that's the key here. we are months now away from a new election cycle in november. we're having a midterm election. there's a great risk here that this could be done again. that there could be additional attempts to interfere in this election. meanwhile, president trump has not yet indicated to his own
9:04 am
intelligence official that he wants them to step in and do something about that, jim. >> and that's quite an alarming omission, abby phillip, traveling with the president, thanks very much. russia is of course responding to these new indictments, as it often does, saying they are an attempt simply to spoil the upcoming summit. nic robertson joins us live from helsinki, the site of that summit. i wonder from russia's perspective, do they view it as helpful to them when the president echoes their own propaganda, in effect, right, that they had nothing to do with this? >> well, it certainly will help what they would hope to get out of the summit here. because, you know, in short when they say there's no evidence, which is what they've been saying in this particular case, this is just a criminal case being made up for a political reason, recycling old fake news is another thing they've been saying about it. this gives them a stronger hand. if we look back to the last time
9:05 am
president trump confronted president putin face-to-face or the first time he did it at the g-20 in hamburg last year, the russian response was just to brush it off. but it was also instructive about how president trump approached telling president putin this. we learned about it afterwards from the russian foreign minister. this is how he explained what president trump did in that situation then. >> translator: president trump said, and i'm sure either he or rex tillerson will say this alleged campaign is of a strange nature because there hasn't been a single fact all these months of allegations, which was recognized by those in congress who are leading this movement at a certain point and brought various administration members on the carpet. president trump said he's heard putin's very clear statements that this is not true and that the russian government didn't interfere in the elections and he accepts these statements. that's all. >> so what sergey lavrov is
9:06 am
saying is president trump didn't present this in a strong way and it was easy for president putin to deny it. you know, this time, president trump seems to have the opportunity to go in, take this -- some parts of this indictment against 12 russian military intelligence officers, and present it to president putin as the evidence. now, no one expects president putin to suddenly roll over himself and say, you know, hands up, it was us, we did it, you know, we're not going to do it again. no one expects that. president trump doesn't expect it, he's already told us, because he said, i'll say, did you do it, and he'll say, no, i didn't do it. no one expects president putin to say we did it and apologize for it. but the idea of going into a summit, and this would be the russian perspective, where they could get away with things like this, means it will be easier for them to get concessions out of president trump on other things. if president trump goes in and very firmly presents the case
9:07 am
that there is evidence, then he accepts that putin's not going to own up, but if he presents it strongly and firmly, less likely that russia would get easy concessions from president trump because we've seen how that works out, easy concessions let's say, with kim jong-un over north korea, so far not making good on their side of it. >> no question, nic robertson, much appreciate it. just to highlight nick's point there, the president is accepting putin's denial over the assessment of an attorney general that he appointed and intelligence chiefs that he's appointed. well, even as those indictments hang over the russia summit, there are new warnings from the head of the u.s. national intelligence agencies that the threat to u.s. elections is not over, that, in fact, it's continuing. >> it was in the months prior to september 2001 when, according to then cia director george
9:08 am
tenet, the system was blimpging red. and here we are two decades, nearly two decades later, and i'm here to say the warning lights are blinking red again. >> just to highlight, if you think this is political, that's a former republican senator there, appointed by this republican president to run the director of national intelligence agency, making that assessment. joining me is the cnn presidential historian as well as a professor at new york university. cynthia hooper, associate professor of politics at the college of -- of history rather at the college of the holy cross. crediti greg prouer, former u.s. attorney. and our gift, tuest, the presid reporter for "the washington post." can you think of a previous incident where the u.s. president has taken the side, in effect, of a foreign leader -- >> no. >> with, you know, a grave
9:09 am
national security threat like this? >> this would be a farce if the implications were not so significant for our country. the president, by his response to the indictments, is sending a message to the entire world,ed me until our elections if you help me. if you help me and my people, please meddle. because that's exactly the message he's sending. there's another element to this. we don't know the details yet. but this is the question we must ask. those indictments are based on information that president trump probably already knew. he was probably told this when he was president-elect trump and when he was given the background to the assessment. which means for a year and a half, president trump has known that russia intelligence acquired a domain name, d.c. leaks, to use, to poison our democracy, and he has done nothing. so we can have a debate about what president obama did. but president-elect trump and president trump, when he became
9:10 am
president, has known about this and has done nothing. in fact, he has done the opposite. he has sent messages to the kremlin to say, it doesn't really matter. that is a major problem. and will congress stand up to him about this? >> cynthia, let me ask you this. you saw the russian foreign minister there when we were speaking to nic robertson, sergey lavrov, in effect repeat phrases that the u.s. president has said about this. you know, that there's no evidence, that, you know, as you heard president say, he accepts president putin's denials. how powerful is that for russia to have the u.s. president echo their propaganda, right? because we know russia's lying. >> oh, it's extraordinarily powerful. and it doesn't help matters that this summit has rather inexplicably been scheduled for the day after the world cup final soccer game is being played in russia, and this month-long tournament has kind
9:11 am
of gone off with great success. fifa president has called it the best world cup in history, and that has allowed russian media to capitalize on the surprise of these tourists who have had a fun time in moscow and hold that up as evidence of how much the country has fallen victim to this alleged, like, anti-russian hi hiysteria that's being promulgated in the u.s. media. now, if trump does go to helsinki, meets with putin, and has some kind of cordial interaction with him or even reaches a deal on something quite concrete like syria, the russian press is going to be able to sort of say that any naysayers to this new kind of activity are simply again echoing this old story and that plays very well to the russian
9:12 am
people. >> coren, typically -- not just typically, i can't think of an exception though, the republicans who will criticize the president publicly on this are either folks on their way out or formers or john mccain really. is there any push on capitol hill among republicans to impose further sanctions or to push the president's hand to impose further sanctions on russia in light of these new indictments? >> in a concrete way, no. there's quite a lot of rhetoric about we have to get tougher on russia. we should get more tough but we can't because the europeans aren't with us. nobody's taking a step to say i'm going to draft a bill that gets harsher on russia than the one passed just about a year ago that stepped up sanctions on russia and north korea. in light of what we've learned from these indictments mueller has been putting out. you are also seeing at the same time a lot of calculated deference to the president. there's been the open question
9:13 am
about should president trump meet with president putin in the wake of this indictment, and a lot of democrats have been saying absolutely not and republicans are saying look, we still have to talk with each other. we own 90% of the world's nuclear warheads. i trust the president to make a judgment call on this and to be tougher on putin than he has in the past. that's all a question of faith though at this point. what results at that meeting, as we've been discussing, can have significant consequences for how russia interprets, you know, if it's going to kind of get away with this kind of thing scott free. russia's not a nation that extra diets its citizens so the idea this indictment will lead to some trial where the individuals named in the indictment are actually charged and jailed or otherwise penalized is probably a stretch. so this is out there for the president to use and act on politically and diplomatically. the question is will he. right now, it seems like he's not inclined. members of congress that are in his party are not inclined yet
9:14 am
to do so. >> not inclined not only to impose further sanctions but to say publicly, forcefully, that he believes that russia interfered in the elections. in fact, he expresses doubt. looking at these indictments, they do not indict any americans. the deputy attorney general announcing them made that clear. however, i wonder, looking there, did the special counsel tie his hands on the possibility of indicting u.s. persons going forward? >> no, not at all. i think what we've seen with the indictments so far including the most recent indictment is the natural progression of an investigation of this type. if, in fact, there is sufficient evidence to indict u.s. persons, i would imagine we will see that as a next step or a couple of steps down the road. no, this makes perfect sense to me, based upon my experience with such investigations. >> all right. tim, cynthia hooper, greg
9:15 am
brower, thank you. the people of ukraine are watching closely. does this meeting signal a resolution for the crimean peninsula where, we should just remind you, there's a war going on, backed by russia, on ukrainian territory? first, the u.s. says it has a plan to reunite thousands of children separated from their families at the mexican border. what are those plans? and will they work this time? stay with us. and the safey for "most parallel parallel parking job" goes to... [ drum roll ] ...emily lapier from ames, iowa. this is emily's third nomination and first win. um...so, just...wow! um, first of all, to my fellow nominees, it is an honor sharing the road with you. and of course, to the progressive snapshot app for giving good drivers the discounts -- no, i have to say it -- for giving good drivers the discounts they deserve. safe driving!
9:16 am
9:17 am
9:18 am
for giving good drivers the discounts they deserve. we carry flowers that signifyn why we want to end the disease. and we walk so that one day, there will be a white flower for alzheimer's first survivor. join the fight at alz.org/walk. so, howell...going? we had a vacation early in our marriage that kinda put us in a hole. go someplace exotic? yeah, bermuda. a hospital in bermuda. a hospital in bermuda. what? what happened? i got a little over-confident on a moped. even with insurance, we had to dip into our 401(k) so it set us back a little bit. sometimes you don't have a choice. but it doesn't mean you can't get back on track. great. yeah, great. i'd like to go back to bermuda. i hear it's nice. yeah, i'd like to see it. no judgment. just guidance. td ameritrade.
9:19 am
just to lower the drivingh position 10 millimeters? why forge intake valves out of titanium, simply to make them a few grams lighter? why make paddle shifters out of magnesium when aluminum would suffice? because when you're crafting performance... ...no measure is too extreme. the lexus lc and lc hybrid experience amazing at your lexus dealer. welcome back. the trump administration now says it has a plan to reunite separated children. children being held at various centers around the country away from their parents. over the next few weeks, those eligible to be brought together again will reunite. health and human services officials, that's the agency in charge here, say the streamlined
9:20 am
vetting process should speed up the reunion so they can meet a court imposed deadline of july 26. joining me is cnn's polo sandoval. polo, how do we know this plan is better than the plan to reunite the kids under 5 when the government missed the deadline in the end. >> how do we know this is actually working? we decided to see for ourselves. we tracked down one parent here in the new york area yesterday after being apprehended along the border illegally in late may. not long after the apprehension took place, he was held in a detention center in texas. and his little boy, his 5-year-old little boy who you see there, was brought to a facility here in the bronx. at one of these government-funded facilities. yesterday, we were there exclusively to capture that moment when both father and child walked out of this facility after having not seen each other for -- in about six weeks. want you to see how this moment played out here and of course the message that this particular father had for other parents. the parents of those roughly
9:21 am
2,500 kids who are still waiting to see their parents again. >> what do you tell other parents that are still waiting to see their kids again? [ speaking foreign language ]. to fight and be strong because eventually they will see their children again. an important distinction here. the july 10th deadline has obviously come and gone. this was the court order that was requiring the government reunite those children below the age of 5. the next one on the horizon, july 26th, that's when the government is requiring the rest of those children, ages 5 and up, to be back with their parents again. i spoke to the attorney of this gentleman yesterday who says this court order has certainly been giving them the upper hand here as they try to force the government to expedite this process because that's clear where i what t
9:22 am
clearly what the government is up against, trying to get kids back with their parents again as we saw during the last deadline that certainly was a tremendous challenge and a very difficult challenge. we're going to be watching, waiting. >> let me ask you this question, because the president has, you know, his response to this in effect said, listen, if you don't want to get separated, don't illegally enter the country. were most of these families seeking asylum because of conditions back home? >> the main drive, the main reason why he came here was obviously trying to flee the violence in his native honduras. >> and he requested asylum? many have requested asylum at the border? is that correct or no? >> he requested asylum once he was in custody. he ended up getting -- relying on a smuggler -- >> got in illegally, then requested asylum. >> he did not get prosecuted under the zero tolerance prolic.
9:23 am
why have we seen so many parents getting threatened with getting pro prosecuted, but then released on bond? the next big challenge for this father and many like him is to prove their case to the federal government that they deserve to be here. and as we've seen under the current guidelines issued by the attorney general, jeff sessions, it's a very -- >> even harder to win that. polo sandoval, thank you. president trump's meeting with vladimir putin is attracting international attention certainly but what will it mean for ukraine? russia's annexation of the crimean peninsula, as well as the ongoing war in eastern ukraine? later, how did russians hack computer networks during the 2016 presidential campaign? we'll have a breakdown of just how sophisticated that cyberattack was. ♪ ♪ can world-renowned artist red hong yi use the chase mobile app® to pay practically anyone, at any bank? all while creating a masterpiece made of tea leaves? ♪ ♪ yes. but this isn't for just anyone.
9:24 am
♪ ♪ hong yi! it's for the strongest man in her life. ♪ ♪ life. lived red's way. chase. make more of what's yours. (door bell rings) it's ohey. this is amazing. with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, are you okay? even when i was there, i never knew when my symptoms would keep us apart. so i talked to my doctor about humira. i learned humira can help get, and keep uc under control when other medications haven't worked well enough. and it helps people achieve control that lasts. so you can experience few or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas
9:25 am
where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, control is possible. a hilton getaway means you get more because... you get another day in paradise. get a sunset on a sunday. get more stories to share. get more from your summer getaway with exclusive hilton offers. book yours, only at hilton.com
9:26 am
when mit rocked our world.ailed we called usaa. and they greeted me as they always do. sergeant baker, how are you? they took care of everything a to z. having insurance is something everyone needs, but having usaa- now that's a privilege.
9:27 am
does your business internet provider promise a lot? let's see who delivers more. comcast business gives you gig-speed in more places. the others don't. we offer up to 6 hours of 4g wireless network backup. everyone else, no way. we let calls from any of your devices come from your business number. them, not so much. we let you keep an eye on your business from anywhere. the others? nope! get internet on our gig-speed network and add voice and tv for $34.90 more per month. call or go on line today. itthat's why i lovel the daily fiber wfiber choice,ood alone.
9:28 am
with the fiber found in many fruits and vegetables. fiber choice. the number one ge recommended chewable prebiotic fiber.
9:29 am
that cease-fire, and the numbers have slightly gone down, and the situation has somewhat improved, but only temporary.
9:30 am
as this week we have seen some deterioration again. >> just to be clear, russian-backed forces still occupy and control significant portion of ukrainian territory in the east, is that right? >> parts of the two eastern region are not government controlled at the moment. almost 500 kilometer long contact line separates government from nongovernment controlled areas. the formations continue to battle with ukrainian sources on the other side. >> nato members are expressing their concerns over russian -- the russian invasion there. nato's chairman even called it a threat to ukraine's overall independence, saying it undermines the civility not just of ukraine but of the region as a whole. do you believe russia wants to maintain this territory, keep it for itself, in effect, make it
9:31 am
part of russia? >> look, jim, i just mentioned, the last week, on 1st of july, the sides have recommitted through dialogue the signatories of the minsk agreement and then the cease-fire violations went down. last week, there was a week without a civilian casualty. so clearly orders were issued last week. they were largely obeyed. it is possible this can end. and dialogue made this possible. and ultimately to end the fighting in eastern ukraine, more dialogue is necessary. >> let me ask you this. president trump recently echoed the kremlin on crimea specifically. saying -- making the case that, well, maybe crimea should belong to russia. what was your reaction to those comments? >> the monetary mission has come into ukraine on the 21st of
9:32 am
march, 2014, just after these last days in february, when the operations went on in crimea. we have a team stationed there, just at the peninsula's end to the main land. we continue to monitor the situation there and will continue to do so and we'll report our findings in our public reports. >> in the view of the oece and nato and the eu, crimea is ukrainian territory, is it not, now occupied, in effect, stolen by russia? >> the mandate of the special mission extends to all of ukraine. this includes the areas it currently does not control. >> understood. final question, if i can, as the president, as president trump sits down with the russian president on monday in helsinki, what would you like to hear him say to the russian president
9:33 am
about ukraine specifically? >> i hope more dialogue will bring more stability. the people in eastern ukraine are waiting for this to end. they tell us it is not their conflict. they tell us they do not understand why this is continuing and have not seen a single day since this day four years ago. they have great hopes that more dialogue will bring more stability. we've seen last week that dialogue can deliver and more dialogue is required. >> let's hope so. alexander hoag, thank you for joining us. the department of justice has indicted 12 russians in connection with hacking attacks on democratic campaign officials. just how did that hack work and what kind of information did they steal? that's next on "cnn newsroom."
9:34 am
i'm ray and i quit smoking with chantix. i tried cold turkey, i tried the patch. they didn't work for me. i didn't think anything was going to work for me until i tried chantix. chantix, along with support, helps you quit smoking. chantix reduced my urge to smoke. i needed that to quit. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. some people had changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, agitation, depressed mood, or suicidal thoughts or actions with chantix. serious side effects may include seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking or allergic and skin reactions which can be life-threatening. stop chantix and get help right away if you have any of these. tell your healthcare provider if you've had depression or other mental health problems. decrease alcohol use while taking chantix. use caution when driving or operating machinery. the most common side effect is nausea. i can't tell you how good it feels
9:35 am
to have smoking behind me. talk to your doctor about chantix.
9:36 am
9:37 am
9:38 am
mystery trip takes people to cool-off beat places and the hook is no one knows where they're going until they get there. it started in 2010 and it's grown to 13 different cities. it's a fun way to explore city, even if you lived there for 20 years, i'm going to show you things you've never seen before.
9:39 am
hey, what's up guys? and you're going to have a fun time. we tailor each trip to the size of the group. it's always a good icebreaker. it's a nice way to have friendly competition. even if these people work together every day. you did all these? nice. mystery trip originally started out as a side business but i turned it into full time. i feel like the luckiest person in the world because i figured out what i want to be when i grow up and it's a really cool feeling. welcome back. president trump set to meet with vladimir putin as we continued to learn more about russia's involvement in the 2016 presidential election hacking. yesterday, 12 russian military intelligence agents were indicted, a cuse e accused of u names and a method called spear phishing to accomplish their goal. cnn's tom foreman breaks it
9:40 am
down. >> investigators say spear-phishing was involved in this process, this hack by the russians. so what exactly is spear-phishing? you ever go to your e-mail box and you find yourself looking at an e-mail that looks like it came from someone you knew and demanding some sort of immediate action? it might be the credit card company, the bank. something like you used your credit card, we have a little problem, send us the numbers again. that's essentially what they're saying happened in this case. some hacker got into these systems. in some cases, we're talking about officials in political parties. and sent e-mails that basically just said look, we got something we need to deal with here. say you're a political leader and you get a note late at night in the campaign saying hey, i'm not the i.t. department, a little problem, can you give me your sign-in i.d. and your password? don't want you to get locked out of the system. you're tired, you're exhausted and you say sure, i'll send it. when you do that, in this case, what was happening,
9:41 am
investigators say, it was opening up a big back door to your system to these hackers. the other way in which this appears to have been happening, going to the hackers that were in fact tied to the russians, was through something called malware. malware can be assigned to your computer or put on to your computer just that same way through an e-mail link or in other ways as well. they can hack in. and what the malware does is in a more automated way it just is scanning your computer constantly, taking information like your contacts, your documents, your passwords. it can even grab screen shots. and, again, transporting all of that right back to russian agents. those are the two key ways electronically that this information was being hacked, and that's what the investigators are going after. >> tom foreman there, breaking it all down for us. joining us now is david kennedy. he's a cybersecurity consultant. what's known as an ethical hacker, a white hat. he joins me now. david, one thing that has struck
9:42 am
me about the russian hack, from the very beginning, and i've been covering this for more than two years, is a lot of the tools that russia used are pretty blunt in technological terms. spear-phishing, you know, it's not some complicated secret nas tool. it relies on one person, like john podesta, the hillary clinton campaign chairman, clicking on the e-mail, opening up the link and opening up his computer to the malware. is that unusual or is that how a lot of state cyber hackers work? >> there's a difference in tactics depending on groups. if you look at this specific group, it's the russian intelligence group called the gru. which is notorious for using these types of techniques. they're very effective and they're very easy to tear down and rebuild new infrastructure and move differently in different directions. it allows them to be very nimble. to get access quickly. when they're busted, just tear it down, build a whole new infrastructure. versus the nas. that typically uses zero days what we call exploit that can rip into computer systems that are highly sophisticated that costs a substantial amount of
9:43 am
money. you're talking millions of dollars for development of these types of tools. very different approaches for how the different agencies work. this one's very effective as we saw back in 2016 and we continue to see today. >> and is that the essential fact they're even russia, this powerful state with an enormous hacking operation, it still uses stuff like spear-phishing because it works? >> absolutely. and that's what we see attackers still using today. corporations. we do these types of hacks for some of the biggest corporations, financial institutions, for government installations. it's so effective of how this can work. all you do is create something that's somewhat believable for a user. they click a link or open a document and they have full access to your computer. it doesn't take a lot of work. russia doesn't really have to change their takectics. it's definitely something that causes maximum damage with little investment. >> i've covered this, you know, oftentimes they will make the e-mail look pretty legit, like they might change one letter in
9:44 am
it or something so that, you know, plausibly you can look and say that is my company or that is my college or something that's e-mailing meg he ining m. when you looked an the indictments on friday, kind of laid out more of the bigger picture of what russia was trying to accomplish there, what did you learn about the extent of the attack and the way it was carried out? >> this indictment blew my mind from a security perspective. because we've been tracking this specific group for a long period. this group is also known as fancy bear. we've known for a long time tied to the gru. we haven't known the exact people involved. this group goes back to the early 2000s, hacking nato, during the french presidency with emmanuel, hacking that infrastructure, hacking the white house. they've been going after critical infrastructure like the energy grid for a number of years. we've never known exactly who they were. the fact the mueller investigation released this much detail about how they were able
9:45 am
to track them and they tracked a lot of their infrastructure through crypto currency and bit coin. they're able to find out who these individuals were and release their names. a huge thing for us. track something back to an individual person or a state agency. it's massive for us. this group has been a pain in the side of the united states for almost a decade. it's something we really are looking at heavily especially in our security community to figure out how much damage they had. >> it undermines that point you often heard from trump or his supporters, what's the evidence, how do we really know? if they're tracking them back to individuals, they've got an electricic trail, as it were. david kennedy, thank you. coming up next, we're going to take a closer look at the new cnn original series "the 2000s." the show breaks down the major events that rocked the beginning of this new century and of course continues to impact events today. please stay with us. who doesn't love a deal?
9:46 am
i do. check out the new united explorer card. saving on this! saving on this! saving in here. rewarded! learn more at theexplorercard.com i'm trying to manage my a1c, then i learn type 2 diabetes puts me at greater risk for heart attack or stroke. can one medicine help treat both blood sugar and cardiovascular risk? i asked my doctor. she told me about non-insulin victoza®. victoza® is not only proven to lower a1c and blood sugar, but for people with type 2 diabetes treating their cardiovascular disease, victoza® is also approved to lower the risk of major cv events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. while not for weight loss, victoza® may help you lose some weight.
9:47 am
(announcer) victoza® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck or symptoms of a serious allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, difficulty breathing, or swallowing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. gallbladder problems have happened in some people. tell your doctor right away if you get symptoms. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, indigestion, and constipation. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. change the course of your treatment. ask your doctor about victoza®. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish,
9:48 am
prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. we carry flowers that signifyn why we want to end the disease. and we walk so that one day, there will be a white flower for alzheimer's first survivor. join the fight at alz.org/walk.
9:49 am
9:50 am
tomorrow, the cnn original series "the 2000s" is back with an all new episode which examines the george w. bush administration from the historic 2000 election to 9/11 and the war on terror. >> it was a righteous war. we had every reason to go to afghanistan. we gave the taliban so many opportunities to give bin laden up and they refused. >> on my orders, the united states military has begun strikes against al qaeda terrorist training camps and military installations of the taliban regime in afghanistan. these carefully targeted actions are designed to disrupt the use of afghanistan as a terrorist
9:51 am
base of operations. >> around the world, there was enormous support for the war in afghanistan. there was a sense that osama bin laden and the taliban had attacked not just the united states but the security of the global community. the u.s. military mission to overthrow the taliban was very swift. it took only about six weeks to force the taliban out of kabul. >> tackling the taliban wasn't that difficult. toppling a government is one thing. to track down individual fugitives, that was difficult. >> the president's approach to this is that it will be continuous but that it will be broadly based and it will be economic and political and diplomatic as well as military, overt and covert. >> the concept, especially by don rumsfeld, was we want a small footprint. there was some wisdom in that. they sent in a bunch of cia officers with suitcases full of money and they hired a bunch of
9:52 am
tribesmen to go after bin laden. >> joining us now, cnn presidential historian tim natalia. i was at the pentagon in september 11th, 2001. does not seem like 17 years ago. did anyone expect at that time we as a country would still be fighting in afghanistan, these 17 years later, and in iraq 14 years after the iraq invasion? >> no. and that's partly because the mission shifted. the problem now is that afghanistan is an unstable place. do you leave afghanistan and then take the risk that it becomes a petri dish again for terrorism. >> and that the taliban comes back? tell us about the forces at play here. first of all, you had president george w. bush following -- we think 2016 was a difficult moment. a disputed election. decided by the supreme court on political lines 5-4. what, eight months after that,
9:53 am
he's faced with the greatest attack on american soil ever. really, a remarkable turn of events. >> remarkable. first of all if you would have asked george w. bush if that first eight months what kind of presidency do you expect to have, sir, he would have said, well, i'm going to focus on domestic issues. >> no more nation building. >> i'm going to be a compassionate conservative. i'm going to give the americans their money back. the federal government doesn't need to have a surplus. and things changed. i've often wondered what would have happened to the debate about al qaeda had al gore become president. there's a nasty partisanship right now about russia. and its intervening in our politics. there wasn't a partisan discussion of al qaeda after 9/11. bill clinton had tried his best and george w. bush -- hadn't tried as hard, but he certainly saw bin laden as a threat. americans understood this is a problem for us as a people and we're going to deal with this in
9:54 am
a nonpartisan way. the partisanship we see today in discussing russia did not exist after 9/11. unfortunately, it would start existing after the invasion of iraq. one of the things about the show is that you see the pivot. you see the nation coming together. the images of 9/11 are still searing. you see the nation coming together behind the president. you see the president leading the country. and then making a fateful decision to shift targets from al qaeda to saddam hussein. >> remarkable. with effects on the war if afghanistan, right. >> absolutely. >> because it was the terms of resources. we're still living through the effects of that war in iraq as well. >> indeed. i think that the bush -- i think that the trump presidency is, in part, a product of what the war in iraq did to the republican party. because trump was -- >> right. >> he may not have been against the war at the time, but he certainly used the war to gin up
9:55 am
support among disgruntled republicans. so without the war in iraq, i don't think you get the trump presidency. >> interesting. well, listen, it's worth watching. it will certainly bring back memories for you as it has for me looking back at those years. a remarkable decade. tim naftali, presidential historian, thank you. please be sure to tune in. an all new episode of the 2000s airs this sunday at 9:00 p.m. only on cnn. we have much more just ahead in the "newsroom" and it all starts just in a couple moments. stay with us. ♪ [ coughs ] ♪ ♪ [ screams ]
9:56 am
♪ [ laughs ] ♪ whoa, whoa, whoa. your one item would be the name your price tool? it helps people save on car insurance. why wouldn't it save me? why? what would you bring? a boat. huh.
9:57 am
9:58 am
9:59 am
10:00 am
hello, thanks for joining me. i'm martin savidge in for fredricka whitfield. all right, let's get started with the political chaos that's surrounding that highly anticipated trump/putin summit. the white house says that the two leaders will speak to the press after their sit-down. all of this after special counsel robert mueller's latest indictments in the russia probe. those indictments have sent cries throughout washington for the president to cancel his summit. asking him to not meet putin alone. saying he's, quote, not a friend of the united states. and all of this as president trump weighs in on the latest indictments by blaming former president obama instead of condemning russia. the president still calling the probe a witch hunt. but it's important to note mueller's probe has now brought 191 criminal charges and 35 defendants. cnn's white house correspondent abby phillip live

152 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on